This is a circular letter that I have drafted up with the intention of sending to all the parents of children involved in this week’s XC Champs. I don’t have much more to say, other than to stress that what is written down below is extremely mild compared to how we are feeling. The way Ella was treated is appalling – and these people are teachers, apparently skilled in managing and communcating with children. The coach, Paul Norton, is extremely popular amongst parents and children, however we have seen a side to him that concerns us greatly.
To put things into perspective, Primary Sports Canterbury who co-ordinates the XC team, is headed by Lyn Miles – the same woman who appeared on Fair Go for not allowing young children to wear polyprops etc whilst playing netball in Christchurch. All makes sense really.
I might add some further thoughts as I cool off. But at the moment, I’m still caught between feeling gutted, guilty and angry.
We wish to bring to your attention, a situation which developed during this week’s Inter-Regional Cross Country trip to Nelson. We have given considerable thought as to whether or not it is appropriate to communicate with the wider team, however we are concerned that some misconceptions might exist and we wish to clarify these.
On Thursday evening at around 6.15pm, we received a telephone call from our daughter, Ella. Ella was feeling very homesick, and wanted to come and stay with us that night. She was phoning from a toilet in the restaurant, she was very upset, and we found it difficult to communicate with her as a result. She did not know the name of the restaurant or its address, so we were unable to come and talk it through with her. We did, however, tell her to talk to her team manager about how she was feeling as we thought this was the most appropriate course of action for her to take.
Ella approached her manager and after consultation with Paul and other management representatives, Ella was told she would not be staying with us that night. Ella became increasingly distressed as a result, and telephoned us again on the bus trip back to the camping ground at around 9.30pm – by this time, she had been upset for some three hours. She came across on the phone as inconsolable, and Bronwyn Manderson of Primary Sport Canterbury took over the call to us.
During the call (and after subsequently arriving at the camping ground), we were repeatedly advised that Ella was not permitted to leave, and that she must stay with the team. Considering the environment, we felt it odd that no empathy or comfort was ever displayed towards Ella by management, rather the constant reinforcing of the rules seemed the priority. We were concerned about Ella’s distressed state and this tested our parenting skills – we were faced with whether to ignore the state our daughter was in and walk away, or to take her with us. We based our decision on the escalating anxiety that was evident in the phone call.
On arrival to collect her, we were told that if she was removed from the camping ground, she would not be eligible for selection for the Canterbury team again. This, we felt, was a punishment that did not fit the ‘crime’.
We gave Ella some time to decide what she wanted to do, however, we do not believe she was in a state that evening to make a rational decision. She wanted to be with her family so this is what she decided to do. To leave her with the team would have created further distress, would have been disruptive to her team members (at 10 o’clock at night), and would have consumed management resources. To simply walk away from our daughter that night would have been a very difficult stance for us to take as parents, and we’re sure many parents would have felt the same way.
Because we collected her, Ella is now no longer eligible to be selected for the Canterbury team again.
On Friday morning, Ella indicated that she was not proud of what had occurred the previous evening, and wanted to attend the compulsory team meeting, and travel back to Christchurch on the bus with her team mates as had been the plan up until that point. We assumed that this would be expected of her as a member of the team, despite what had occurred the previous evening.
After Friday morning’s team meeting and in preparation to leave Nelson, Ella was told to get off the bus by management. She was told that she was no longer a member of the team with effect from the previous evening. This distressed her considerably, particularly as she said the message was delivered angrily to her by management, without any support, let alone from us as her parents. Any communication should have been followed up with us at an appropriate time - using an 11 year old child as a pawn was totally unacceptable.
Both buses subsequently left without her. We had already begun our return trip to Christchurch, were out of cellphone range, and therefore unable to be contacted.
We are extremely grateful to Susie Henderson who took Ella in her car to Kaikoura, at which point Ella was permitted to reboard the bus (we are unsure what this achieved, other than to further punish, bully and ostracise a child who could not understand what she had done wrong). Susie showed the compassion towards Ella that we thought would have been displayed the previous evening by team management.
We are aware that some team members and parents will have seen this situation unfold and we wanted to clarify that Ella was in no way involved in a disciplinary matter. Ella has done nothing wrong in our view, other than to experience a case of separation anxiety from her family; a situation that was not going to be resolved by leaving her that evening with the team.
We fully acknowledge that rules need to be in place to ensure the effective running of an event such as that which was held this week. We applied the ‘100 mile rule’ wherever possible to give Ella the independence needed during the trip. However, we acted in the best interests of our child and have been left feeling extremely saddened at the lack of compassion, discretion and seemingly extreme action that has been levelled at a child. The effect of such heavy handed action has had a considerable impact on our daughter.
Thank you for reading.
Kind regards
Graham & Rachel Harris